Real Crime: A Shot in the Dark, Thursday 10.30pm, ITV1
Posted by Tom Murphy
I’m not normally a fan of ‘crime porn’ – although Danny Dyer’s Tastiest Geezers on Chap2+1 often a raises a few (unintentional) chuckles. However, this series, hosted by respected reporter Mark Austin, succeeds in pulling the crimes out of the tabloid headlines and into a more human context.
When reclusive farmer Tony Martin shot and killed 16-year-old burglar Fred Barras in August 1999, the case sparked a furious public debate about how far people should be able to go to defend their property.
The decision to prosecute Martin brought outrage from his supporters, in both the local community and the national press. The general consensus was not only should he not have been brought to trial, but he should have been given a medal instead.
However, the documentary moved beyond the bluster and indignation to highlight the legal arguments that were being played out. We saw and heard exclusive clips of police interviews and were given the evidence of expert witnesses – including one bloke whose job seemed to consist primarily of blasting lumps of meat with a shotgun.
To predictable public outcry – orchestrated and exploited by the tabloids, as explained by Max Clifford – a jury convicted Martin of murder; he had exceeded the reasonable use of force to defend himself and had intended to kill or seriously injure Barras (and his accomplice Brendon Fearon, who was injured during the confrontation.)
Martin’s lawyers soon launched an appeal, focusing on his state of mind. A combination of paranoia, resulting from childhood abuse, and depression, relating to ongoing illness and previous burglaries, had left him with an intense and overwhelming fear of “violation”.
Based on this evidence, the appeal was upheld and his crime reduced to manslaughter, on the grounds of diminished responsibility. By July 2003, he was free again.
The programme then showed how Martin became an unlikely – and, probably, unsuitable – icon for those who wanted change in the law relating to self-defence. With the unstoppable weight of public support behind it, the Criminal Justice Act of 2008 finally offered greater protection for householders. Indeed, legal experts doubted that Martin would even be prosecuted today.
The fact that the case still arouses strong feelings indicates what a raw nerve it touched. However, the documentary offered a 360-degree view of the case, not backing away from the fact that whatever his crime, Fred Barras was little more than a misguided child who probably didn’t deserve to bleed to death alone in a Norfolk forest.
Picture: PA
SEE ALSO:
Jack the Ripper: Tabloid Killer - Revealed >>
Real Crime: Rachel Nickell >>
Madeleine Was Here >>


