It's just sour grapes from Smith
The sight of Graeme Smith whingeing about being refused a runner during South Africa's defeat to England has been the most entertaining sideshow of the Champions Trophy tournament.
Suddenly Andrew Strauss, having been hailed a saint for recalling Sri Lanka's Angelo Mathews after he was given run out following a collision with Graham Onions, became the sinner of Centurion.
Smith, after hitting a career-best 141, was miffed because Strauss and the umpires had turned down his request for a runner when he was suffering from cramp as the match drew towards its thrilling climax.
The whiff of sour grapes from the South Africa captain is as powerful as the pull shot that brings him so many runs. As Strauss rightly said when the post-match row flared: "Cramping to a certain extent is a preparation thing and to a certain extent a conditioning thing. I didn't feel he merited having a runner at that stage."
An ICC spokesman said later that the umpires had taken the view that cramp is a symptom of fatigue and as such did not warrant a runner.
Quite right too, especially as Smith wanted to bring on one of the quickest players between the wicket in AB de Villiers at a time when the match was in the balance.
And for the record, Law 2.1 (b) says: "The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time."
To his credit, Strauss is proving to be a captain who won't be bullied, and he's doing it without losing his sense of dignity.
As for Smith, he's right to say that what goes around, comes around. Which is why the forthcoming Test and ODI series between England and South Africa should have an extra dash of spice to it.
Does Smith have genuine cause for complaint? Or was Strauss right to stand his ground? Add your comments below
