Nelson's Column: Leave Flintoff out

A second successive duck has confirmed one thing; Andrew Flintoff should not be recalled to the England side to face New Zealand.

Freddie may have bowled with his usual excellence, but for England's long-term success, they need an all-rounder at six, not a bowler who bats at seven.

What on earth is the rush? Even without Flintoff in the attack, England must defeat a weak Kiwi outfit at Lord's. Surely it makes sense to give him time to get some runs under his belt with Lancashire.

Only with Flintoff excelling with the willow at six can England rediscover the form of 2004-05.

The selectors won't see it this way - it's an absolute guarantee. Are they worried that runs or wickets from the man/men that Flintoff could replace will make it difficult for them to bring him back later in the summer?

Tough. Selectors are paid to make big decisions. Flintoff must return at some point - that's obvious. But not now.

Is it too early for Flintoff or does his bowling warrant a recall in itself? Send in your views using the boxes below.

Comments

[Jeremy, Wincanton]

Completely agree. Rushing Flintoff back is a waste of time against New Zealand. He should be made to get up to peak form (or as close to it as possible) in time for the really tough test against South Africa. We don't want him injured for that.