Another baby for Jordan?

Posted by Jane Murphy

She may be one of the hardest-working women in showbiz - but model/author/TV presenter/nuclear scientist Jordan still plans to add another child to her growing brood.

"I would definitely love to adopt a child," she says. "A disabled child from this country, I think. I would love to adopt any child of course, but disabled children need a home, too, and I know how to deal with the situation because of Harvey. And Peter agrees as well because we've already spoken about it."

The 29-year-old was in Edinburgh yesterday to sign copies of the third volume of her autobiography. And after last week's "wardrobe malfunction" - in which shoppers at a London branch of Waterstone's were momentarily treated to the sight of her left nipple - Jordan played it safe in a cover-all black jumper.

The only problem? Well, as you can see from our picture, Jordan's oh-so-sensible white bra was clearly visible beneath her sweater - leading to tabloid accusations that her dress sense has become "dowdy" and "boring" overnight. She can't win, can she?

Picture: Wenn

SEE ALSO:
Jordan's drug shock >>
Jordan declares war >>
Jordan v Chantelle >>

Comments

[emma]

what on earth is your problem?? Who cares whether she is going for a bit of publicity? Adoption isnt taken lightly in this country and if they are not considered to be fit parents then they wont be able to!! Also they would probably end up adopting a child that is very difficult to place otherwise and realistically would probably end up moving from foster home to foster home - if theyre lucky!!! So perhaps you all could take a leaf out of their book!!!

[Angie]

Well I dont agree what you say at all I think Jordan and Peter do everything they can to help children. They are great parents and I think its great how they want to take on a disabled child.They wouldn't be taking on the child if it was to much. The child will love them. I say goodluck Jordan and Peter. You's are great.

[Nigel]

Let us be clear here. Jordon, as always, is playing a very clever game. She knows full well that nobody will criticise her for adopting a child with special needs or, as she puts, disabilities. But remember that Jordan's job is to sell every inch of her life to the newspapers, book publishers and magazines that are her indirect employers. Her skill is not one any firm would want, though, but rather a very slick ability to market herserlf, her life, her husband, her house and (until recently) her boobs. And very skilled she is. But I will say what other commentators might dare not to. Jordan, or Katie, is entering dangerous territory when vulnerable and innocent children are used as currency in today's reveal-all celebrity culture.

[rachel]

i dis agree with u all, she is a great example to young women everywhere, her money is never something she makes a big deal of, her and peter are a great couple like all couples they argue but they love their kids dearly and their children are never left without them for long periods, they do a great job, you go jordan.

[me-me]

Think this is just going too far.She knows how much time and efort it takes to look after a disabled child. They both work more hours than the adverage person. Come on when will you get time with these kids.

[www.poundpig.co.uk]

I completley agree with the comment below...how much more of her family can she sell to the magazines!

[Suzy57]

How soon before another nauseous photo spread of the 'happy family' appears in Hello, Heat,OK or whatever other vile rag this pathetic excuse for a woman has sold her soul to? All we need now is for Vicky Beckham to get the same idea!!

[Mac]

If Jordans Nanny's comments are anything to go by, I think she should forget it, Peter should grow a pair and get a grip of his missus, what a ashambles the pair are, hard working, loving parents, responsible...I don't think so!

[sense]

Well I agree with the comments already made. I think that making a decision to adopt a child is a huge one,however I can't help thinking that this is being done for publicity,so sad to say especially at the expense of a young child.

[claudia]

Could they love an adopted child as much as their own ? Do they realise that each diasbled child is unique and not comparable to the nesxt (ie Harvey)?
If yes then great go for it ...... somehow however I suspect their motives are more to do with publicity.
I mean for a start - why blab about it in the first place ?? Surely its a personnal and private decision....
On a lighter note - that bra looks fking awful !!!!

[mark]

i just hope for the kids sake shes adopting a child to be loved . yeah she has the money to give a child a better home but money aint everything and if shes thinking of adopting great but dont do it for the lime light and then pap the kid off on the nanny . do it for the right reasons as these children have been either put up for adoption because there parents couldnt aford to keep them or throu a bad up bringing . drugs, alcohal or depression

[Bobbo]

Jesus HELP ME!!, I'd Bang them Armpits!!